Jump to content

Please compare these ways in performance


omid3098
 Share

Recommended Posts

just want to know which way use less process? if possibble with little describtion..

  • Floating a boat using waterplane physics.
  • Floating a boat using keyframe animation and disable waterplane physics.
  • Floating a boat using lines of script and again disable waterplane physics.

.

 

thank before :(

Omid Saadat

OD Arts Blog

 

AMD Phenom II X4 940 - Geforce 8800GTS - 4GB RAM - XP x86

AMD 6000+ - Geforce 9800 GT - 2GB RAM - XP x86 (Home pc)

Intel Core i7 - Geforce 310M - 4GB Ram - Win7 x64 (Laptop)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Physics are obviously going to be the slowest, especially where buoyancy is concerned. I would also suspect that keyframe animation is nicer on the CPU. But keyframing alone wouldn't take any possible waves on the water into account. In the case of waves, physics are going to provide the most realistic look.

LE Version: 2.50 (Eventually)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you should use the physics system because it will interact the best with other physical objects. None of the methods you listed will have any bearing on performance.

My job is to make tools you love, with the features you want, and performance you can't live without.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...